← Opportunities · Pairs

BTCB/WBNB

0x7130d2a12b9bcbfae4f2634d864a1ee1ce3ead9c / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x7130d2a12b9bcbfae4f2634d864a1ee1ce3ead9c-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-10-08 (UTC)

⚠️ 1 source(s) feeding this pair are currently unavailable/stale: uniswap v3. Data shown may be incomplete. See Source Health.

Opportunity score

Score
0
Confidence
low
Topaz present
yes

Types: ignore_or_monitor

Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet

Reason codes: topaz_only_no_competitor

Scored as of 2026-10-08.

Trends (daily, 34d window)

Volume over time
Fees earned over time
Effective fee (bps) over time
Topaz volume share over time

Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)

93.6% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.

Trade sizeSwapsVolumeShare of volume
< $10038,576$1.25M33.8%
$100 – $1k13,476$2.22M59.8%
$1k – $10k26$47.3K1.3%
$10k – $100k6$188.1K5.1%
≥ $100k0$00.0%

Fee change effectiveness (hourly)

Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.

topaz2026-09-28 23:50 UTCbase 50→250workingconfident168h elapsed

fees up while share held: fees/hr +42%, vol share +0%, competitor vol/hr n/a over first 72h

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$2 → $2+38%100% → 100%+0%$0 → $0—0.74 → 2.77
24h24$2 → $2+22%100% → 100%+0%$0 → $0—0.74 → 2.80
72h72$2 → $2+42%100% → 100%+0%$0 → $0—0.74 → 2.81
7d168$2 → $2+45%100% → 100%+0%$0 → $0—0.74 → 2.85
Router reaction (volume/hr before → after)
RouterBeforeAfterΔSwaps
0x0c73aead…ce6cec$7.1K$2.5K-65%5,027 → 3,536
0x278d858f…6ef8d2$4.8K$2.0K-59%990 → 909
0x29be31e7…3e9a7b$3.3K$1.3K-60%640 → 625
0x8f10b468…13f996$1.0K$114-89%266 → 73
0x7a7ad9aa…4997ff$1.4K$666-51%1,001 → 1,243
0x9b63ca87…6e0cae$718$87-88%217 → 95
topaz2026-07-28 03:12 UTCK 5000000→6000000, base 75→50inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
24h24$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
72h72$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
7d168$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
topaz2026-07-01 00:22 UTCK 3500000→5000000, base ?→75inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
24h24$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
72h72$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
7d168$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
topaz2026-06-18 23:13 UTCK ?→3500000inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
24h24$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
72h72$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —
7d168$0 → $0—— → ——$0 → $0—— → —

Fee change impact

On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).

topaz v3 0xfda4…14a5
When (UTC)ChangeVol/day before→afterΔFees/day before→afterΔEff bps before→afterWindow
2026-09-28 23:50base 50→250$1.29M → $241.7K-81%$103 → $59-43%0.80 → 2.4423d vs 11d
2026-07-28 03:12K 5000000→6000000, base 75→50$0 → $1.29M—$0 → $103—— → 0.800d vs 23d
2026-07-01 00:22K 3500000→5000000, base ?→75$0 → pending—$0 → pending—— → —0d vs —
2026-06-18 23:13K ?→3500000$0 → pending—$0 → pending—— → —0d vs —

Pools (9)

DEXFeeTick7d vol14d vol30d vol7d fees14d fees30d feesLiquidityCandidate reasons
topaz v3dynamic50$1.50M$4.29M$22.92M$437$761$2.2K$109.0K—
pancake v31 bps1$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #22, liquidity #198
pancake v35 bps10$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #1, lifetime_volume #6, liquidity #42
pancake v3100 bps200$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #4
pancake v325 bps50$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #3, liquidity #94, lifetime_volume #97
uniswap v35 bps10$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_14d_volume #2, recent_28d_volume #3, liquidity #4, recent_14d_fees #5, recent_28d_fees #5, lifetime_volume #7
uniswap v3100 bps200$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #4
uniswap v31 bps1$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #3
uniswap v330 bps60$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #211

Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.