← Opportunities · Pairs

BTCB/WBNB

0x7130d2a12b9bcbfae4f2634d864a1ee1ce3ead9c / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x7130d2a12b9bcbfae4f2634d864a1ee1ce3ead9c-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-08-08 (UTC)

Opportunity score

Score
62
Confidence
low
Topaz present
yes

Types: existing_pair_capture_opportunity

Recommended action: improve incentives/emissions + review dynamic-fee settings, monitor share response

Reason codes: fees_30d_ge_50k, active_days_ge_24, competitor_fee_ge_5bps, ultra_low_fee_competitor_penalty, volume_30d_ge_5m, liquidity_ge_500k, declining_run_rate, topaz_fee_share_lt_10pct, topaz_volume_share_lt_10pct, major_asset_side, competitor_tighter_tick_spacing

Scored as of 2026-08-08.

Trends (daily, 34d window)

Volume over time
Fees earned over time
Effective fee (bps) over time
Topaz volume share over time

Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)

95.9% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.

Trade sizeSwapsVolumeShare of volume
< $10089,417$2.67M15.2%
$100 – $1k69,619$14.24M80.8%
$1k – $10k273$539.8K3.1%
$10k – $100k11$175.9K1.0%
≥ $100k0$00.0%

Fee change effectiveness (hourly)

Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.

topaz2026-07-28 03:12 UTCK 5000000→6000000, base 75→50inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no clear signal: fees/hr -6%, vol share -8%, competitor vol/hr +25% over first 72h

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$5$2-59%9%8%-11%$492.6K$320.9K-35%0.960.68
24h24$5$4-23%9%11%+17%$492.6K$414.5K-16%0.960.74
72h72$5$5-6%9%9%-8%$492.6K$615.3K+25%0.960.80
7d168$5$4-17%9%7%-21%$492.6K$658.9K+34%0.960.77
Router reaction (volume/hr before → after)
RouterBeforeAfterΔSwaps
0x3bc367863f2717$8.6K$13.9K+62%1,0095,137
0x0c73aeadce6cec$9.5K$13.3K+39%3,12814,917
0x278d858f6ef8d2$20.7K$17.6K-15%2,5136,193
0xa4ad26f9df593d$3.9K$5.0K+28%5522,135
0x63aeff0fe8407d$2.2K$1.4K-34%6511,371
0xc47b68f73404cf$803$358-55%5070
topaz2026-07-01 00:22 UTCK 3500000→5000000, base ?→75inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0$0$0$0
24h24$0$0$0$0
72h72$0$0$0$0
7d168$0$27%$0$269.7K0.98
topaz2026-06-18 23:13 UTCK ?→3500000inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0$0$0$0
24h24$0$0$0$0
72h72$0$0$0$0
7d168$0$0$0$0

Fee change impact

On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).

topaz v3 0xfda414a5
When (UTC)ChangeVol/day before→afterΔFees/day before→afterΔEff bps before→afterWindow
2026-07-28 03:12K 5000000→6000000, base 75→50$1.09M$1.30M+20%$105$101-4%0.960.7822d vs 12d
2026-07-01 00:22K 3500000→5000000, base ?→75$0$1.09M$0$1050.960d vs 22d
2026-06-18 23:13K ?→3500000$0pending$0pending0d vs

Pools (9)

DEXFeeTick7d vol14d vol30d vol7d fees14d fees30d feesLiquidityCandidate reasons
topaz v3dynamic50$9.32M$17.39M$33.26M$716$1.4K$2.9K$119.52M
pancake v35 bps10$20.93M$59.52M$130.17M$10.5K$29.8K$65.1K$9.63Mpair_scoped_supplement #1, lifetime_volume #6, recent_28d_fees #9, recent_14d_volume #12, recent_28d_volume #12, recent_14d_fees #13, liquidity #42
uniswap v35 bps10$38.75M$68.57M$125.57M$19.4K$34.3K$62.8K$9.32Mpair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_28d_volume #3, liquidity #4, recent_14d_volume #4, recent_14d_fees #6, recent_28d_fees #6, lifetime_volume #7
pancake v31 bps1$3.09M$19.38M$48.55M$309$1.9K$4.9K$731.0Kpair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #22, recent_14d_volume #29, recent_28d_volume #31, recent_14d_fees #80, recent_28d_fees #130, liquidity #198
pancake v325 bps50$29.1K$319.3K$713.9K$73$798$1.8K$2.16Mpair_scoped_supplement #3, liquidity #94, lifetime_volume #97, recent_14d_fees #141
uniswap v330 bps60$997$2.1K$4.3K$3$6$13$2.5Kpair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #205
pancake v3100 bps200$3$125$217$0$1$2$2.1Kpair_scoped_supplement #4
uniswap v3100 bps200$2$56$99$0$1$1$292pair_scoped_supplement #4
uniswap v31 bps1$0$0$0$0$0$0$0pair_scoped_supplement #3

Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.