BULLA/WBNB
0x595e21b20e78674f8a64c1566a20b2b316bc3511 / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x595e21b20e78674f8a64c1566a20b2b316bc3511-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-08-08 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: ignore_or_monitor
Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet
Reason codes: active_days_ge_15, competitor_fee_ge_25bps, low_liquidity_penalty, declining_run_rate, low_swap_count_penalty, topaz_fee_share_lt_10pct, topaz_volume_share_lt_10pct, major_asset_side
Scored as of 2026-08-08.
Trends (daily, 23d window)
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0x17c3…152f| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-21 09:47 | cap ?→3000, K ?→3000000, base ?→750 | $0 → $0 | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → 30.00 | 0d vs 2d |
Pools (5)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $3 | — | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $1 | $2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $6.7K | pair_scoped_supplement #1 | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| uniswap v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #1 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.