SOL/WBNB
0x570a5d26f7765ecb712c0924e4de545b89fd43df / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x570a5d26f7765ecb712c0924e4de545b89fd43df-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-08-08 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: ignore_or_monitor
Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet
Reason codes: active_days_ge_24, competitor_fee_ge_5bps, ultra_low_fee_competitor_penalty, volume_30d_ge_5m, liquidity_ge_500k, declining_run_rate, topaz_fee_share_lt_10pct, major_asset_side, competitor_tighter_tick_spacing
Scored as of 2026-08-08.
Trends (daily, 34d window)
Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)
97.0% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.
| Trade size | Swaps | Volume | Share of volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < $100 | 8,042 | $463.8K | 36.4% | |
| $100 – $1k | 4,791 | $771.1K | 60.6% | |
| $1k – $10k | 22 | $37.9K | 3.0% | |
| $10k – $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% | |
| ≥ $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% |
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
only 0 post-change hour(s) so far — too early to judge
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
| 24h | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
| 72h | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
| 7d | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0xfd8d…725c| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-09 19:49 | cap 4000→3000, base 1000→500 | $0 → $72.7K | — | $0 → $40 | — | — → 5.44 | 0d vs 34d |
| 2026-06-09 18:49 | cap ?→4000, K ?→5000000, base ?→1000 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
Pools (9)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $610.0K | $1.21M | $2.09M | $333 | $664 | $1.1K | $158.01M | — | |
| pancake v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $496.5K | $4.46M | $15.87M | $248 | $2.2K | $7.9K | $1.31M | pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_14d_volume #66, recent_28d_fees #69, recent_14d_fees #70, recent_28d_volume #78, lifetime_volume #80, liquidity #128 | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $134.8K | $404.0K | $1.80M | $404 | $1.2K | $5.4K | $349.1K | pair_scoped_supplement #1, liquidity #42, recent_28d_volume #57, recent_28d_fees #71, recent_14d_volume #77, recent_14d_fees #96, lifetime_volume #110 | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $15.6K | $104.6K | $220.0K | $39 | $262 | $550 | $949.3K | pair_scoped_supplement #2, liquidity #165, lifetime_volume #167 | |
| pancake v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $97 | $383 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $1.1K | pair_scoped_supplement #3 | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $383 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| uniswap v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $2.9K | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| uniswap v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| uniswap v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.