USDT/WBNB

0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955 / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-08-08 (UTC)

⚠️ 1 source(s) feeding this pair are currently unavailable/stale: pancake infinity. Data shown may be incomplete. See Source Health.

Opportunity score

Score

Confidence

low

Topaz present

yes

Types: existing_pair_capture_opportunity, incentivize_liquidity

Recommended action: improve incentives/emissions + review dynamic-fee settings, monitor share response

Reason codes: fees_30d_ge_50k, active_days_ge_24, ultra_low_fee_competitor_penalty, volume_30d_ge_5m, liquidity_ge_500k, declining_run_rate, topaz_fee_share_lt_10pct, topaz_volume_share_lt_10pct, major_asset_side, competitor_tighter_tick_spacing, topaz_tick_spacing_disadvantage, consider_tighter_topaz_pool

Scored as of 2026-08-08.

Trends (daily, 34d window)

Volume over time

Fees earned over time

Effective fee (bps) over time

Topaz volume share over time

Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)

86.8% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.

Trade size	Swaps	Volume	Share of volume
< $100	223,802	$7.06M	11.8%
$100 – $1k	207,709	$44.76M	75.0%
$1k – $10k	1,302	$3.77M	6.3%
$10k – $100k	186	$4.09M	6.9%
≥ $100k	0	$0	0.0%

Fee change effectiveness (hourly)

Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.

topaz2026-08-02 22:50 UTCcap 200→250, K 6000000→7700000workingconfident163h elapsed

fees up while share held: fees/hr +52%, vol share +175%, competitor vol/hr -59% over first 72h

Window	After hrs	Topaz fees/hr before→after	Δ	Vol share before→after	Δ	Competitor vol/hr	Δ	Eff bps before→after
6h	6	$8 → $8	-9%	5% → 4%	-17%	$3.70M → $3.49M	-6%	0.42 → 0.49
24h	24	$8 → $11	+36%	5% → 6%	+8%	$3.70M → $3.72M	+1%	0.42 → 0.52
72h	72	$8 → $13	+52%	5% → 14%	+175%	$3.70M → $1.51M	-59%	0.42 → 0.51
7d	163	$8 → $10	+13%	5% → 19%	+264%	$3.70M → $847.7K	-77%	0.42 → 0.49

Router reaction (volume/hr before → after)

Router	Before	After	Δ	Swaps
0x7a7ad9aa…4997ff	$0	$18.0K	new	0 → 23,240
0x8f10b468…13f996	$20.8K	$10.1K	-51%	3,017 → 3,837
0x278d858f…6ef8d2	$24.4K	$33.9K	+39%	2,578 → 9,870
0x4ab6a879…e1862f	$19.5K	$27.8K	+43%	64 → 199
0x3bc36786…3f2717	$32.9K	$40.9K	+24%	3,997 → 13,356
0x9b63ca87…6e0cae	$42.3K	$47.2K	+12%	5,155 → 15,332

topaz2026-07-28 03:12 UTCcap 500→200, K 7000000→6000000, base 50→20inconclusiveconfident138h elapsed

no clear signal: fees/hr -12%, vol share +50%, competitor vol/hr +1% over first 72h

Window	After hrs	Topaz fees/hr before→after	Δ	Vol share before→after	Δ	Competitor vol/hr	Δ	Eff bps before→after
6h	6	$9 → $5	-44%	2% → 5%	+122%	$4.45M → $2.37M	-47%	0.88 → 0.40
24h	24	$9 → $7	-29%	2% → 4%	+57%	$4.45M → $3.56M	-20%	0.88 → 0.49
72h	72	$9 → $8	-12%	2% → 3%	+50%	$4.45M → $4.49M	+1%	0.88 → 0.51
7d	138	$9 → $8	-8%	2% → 4%	+63%	$4.45M → $4.63M	+4%	0.88 → 0.47

Router reaction (volume/hr before → after)

Router	Before	After	Δ	Swaps
0x9b63ca87…6e0cae	$9.4K	$24.3K	+158%	1,354 → 9,465
0x3bc36786…3f2717	$21.1K	$33.1K	+57%	2,975 → 13,354
0xa4ad26f9…df593d	$12.5K	$17.6K	+40%	1,922 → 7,935
0x4ab6a879…e1862f	$0	$3.9K	new	0 → 22
0x63aeff0f…e8407d	$18.5K	$21.5K	+16%	5,101 → 21,453
0x278d858f…6ef8d2	$21.7K	$24.3K	+12%	2,719 → 9,329

topaz2026-07-16 05:34 UTCcap 150→500, K 3500000→7000000watchconfident168h elapsed

fees up but share softening: fees/hr +18%, vol share -18%, competitor vol/hr -2% over first 72h

Window	After hrs	Topaz fees/hr before→after	Δ	Vol share before→after	Δ	Competitor vol/hr	Δ	Eff bps before→after
6h	6	$8 → $5	-36%	4% → 2%	-50%	$3.05M → $3.01M	-1%	0.69 → 0.91
24h	24	$8 → $19	+139%	4% → 5%	+44%	$3.05M → $2.93M	-4%	0.69 → 1.17
72h	72	$8 → $9	+18%	4% → 3%	-18%	$3.05M → $2.97M	-2%	0.69 → 1.02
7d	168	$8 → $7	-9%	4% → 3%	-31%	$3.05M → $2.98M	-2%	0.69 → 0.93

Router reaction (volume/hr before → after)

Router	Before	After	Δ	Swaps
0x00000000…1c24fe	$68	$21.1K	+30763%	17 → 252
0x63aeff0f…e8407d	$20.7K	$3.9K	-81%	6,510 → 4,509
0xf4d8bdcd…f2931d	$16.3K	$10.0K	-39%	8,517 → 12,793
0x3bc36786…3f2717	$22.3K	$16.0K	-28%	3,004 → 7,102
0x4ab6a879…e1862f	$7.6K	$1.5K	-80%	32 → 16
0x278d858f…6ef8d2	$14.2K	$8.4K	-41%	1,930 → 3,311

topaz2026-07-01 00:22 UTCcap 100→150, base 20→50inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

Window	After hrs	Topaz fees/hr before→after	Δ	Vol share before→after	Δ	Competitor vol/hr	Δ	Eff bps before→after
6h	6	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
24h	24	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
72h	72	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
7d	168	$0 → $3	—	— → 3%	—	$0 → $1.36M	—	— → 0.74

topaz2026-06-23 10:53 UTCcap ?→100, base ?→20inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

Window	After hrs	Topaz fees/hr before→after	Δ	Vol share before→after	Δ	Competitor vol/hr	Δ	Eff bps before→after
6h	6	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
24h	24	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
72h	72	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
7d	168	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —

topaz2026-06-18 23:13 UTCK 5000000→3500000inconclusiveconfident106h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

Window	After hrs	Topaz fees/hr before→after	Δ	Vol share before→after	Δ	Competitor vol/hr	Δ	Eff bps before→after
6h	6	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
24h	24	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
72h	72	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
7d	106	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —

topaz2026-06-09 19:24 UTCK ?→5000000inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

Window	After hrs	Topaz fees/hr before→after	Δ	Vol share before→after	Δ	Competitor vol/hr	Δ	Eff bps before→after
6h	6	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
24h	24	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
72h	72	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —
7d	168	$0 → $0	—	— → —	—	$0 → $0	—	— → —

Fee change impact

On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).

topaz v3 0x767f…65b4

When (UTC)	Change	Vol/day before→after	Δ	Fees/day before→after	Δ	Eff bps before→after	Window
2026-08-02 22:50	cap 200→250, K 6000000→7700000	$4.12M → $4.78M	+16%	$200 → $232	+16%	0.49 → 0.48	5d vs 7d
2026-07-28 03:12	cap 500→200, K 7000000→6000000, base 50→20	$1.82M → $4.12M	+126%	$159 → $200	+26%	0.87 → 0.49	12d vs 5d
2026-07-16 05:34	cap 150→500, K 3500000→7000000	$2.90M → $1.82M	-37%	$202 → $159	-22%	0.70 → 0.87	10d vs 12d
2026-07-01 00:22	cap 100→150, base 20→50	$0 → $2.90M	—	$0 → $202	—	— → 0.70	0d vs 10d
2026-06-23 10:53	cap ?→100, base ?→20	$0 → pending	—	$0 → pending	—	— → —	0d vs —
2026-06-18 23:13	K 5000000→3500000	$0 → pending	—	$0 → pending	—	— → —	0d vs —
2026-06-09 19:24	K ?→5000000	$0 → pending	—	$0 → pending	—	— → —	0d vs —

Pools (12)

DEX	Fee	Tick	7d vol	14d vol	30d vol	7d fees	14d fees	30d fees	Liquidity	Candidate reasons
topaz v3	dynamic	50	$33.45M	$58.07M	$91.57M	$1.6K	$2.9K	$5.6K	$113.1K	—
pancake v3	1 bps	1	$77.41M	$698.46M	$1.62B	$7.7K	$69.8K	$162.1K	$24.01M	lifetime_volume #1, recent_14d_volume #1, recent_28d_volume #1, pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_28d_fees #3, recent_14d_fees #4, liquidity #30
uniswap v3	5 bps	10	$37.01M	$82.87M	$177.54M	$18.5K	$41.4K	$88.8K	$4.80M	recent_28d_volume #2, pair_scoped_supplement #2, recent_14d_volume #3, recent_14d_fees #5, recent_28d_fees #5, lifetime_volume #10, liquidity #13
pancake v3	5 bps	10	$3.49M	$31.13M	$76.46M	$1.7K	$15.6K	$38.2K	$13.94M	pair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #9, recent_28d_fees #15, recent_14d_volume #17, recent_14d_fees #21, recent_28d_volume #23, liquidity #39
uniswap v3	1 bps	1	$25.55M	$52.80M	$99.52M	$2.6K	$5.3K	$10.0K	$482.0K	pair_scoped_supplement #1, lifetime_volume #2, recent_14d_volume #5, recent_28d_volume #5, liquidity #24, recent_14d_fees #34, recent_28d_fees #41
pancake v3	25 bps	50	$6.0K	$74.1K	$653.2K	$15	$185	$1.6K	$76.6K	pair_scoped_supplement #3, recent_28d_fees #107
uniswap v3	30 bps	60	$98.0K	$186.7K	$346.0K	$294	$560	$1.0K	$305.5K	pair_scoped_supplement #3, liquidity #29, lifetime_volume #55, recent_14d_volume #126, recent_14d_fees #144
uniswap v3	100 bps	200	$16.9K	$32.6K	$63.8K	$169	$326	$638	$91.9K	pair_scoped_supplement #4, liquidity #68
pancake v3	100 bps	200	$152	$3.4K	$6.4K	$2	$34	$64	$15.2K	pair_scoped_supplement #4
pancake infinity	0.61 bps	1	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	—
pancake infinity	0.58 bps	1	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	—
pancake infinity	0.59 bps	1	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	$0	—

Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.