USDT/SOL
0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955 / 0x570a5d26f7765ecb712c0924e4de545b89fd43df
pairKey 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955-0x570a5d26f7765ecb712c0924e4de545b89fd43df · as of 2026-10-08 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: ignore_or_monitor
Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet
Reason codes: topaz_only_no_competitor
Scored as of 2026-10-08.
Trends (daily, 34d window)
Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)
97.7% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.
| Trade size | Swaps | Volume | Share of volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < $100 | 14,373 | $1.00M | 50.7% | |
| $100 – $1k | 6,712 | $932.5K | 47.0% | |
| $1k – $10k | 20 | $45.5K | 2.3% | |
| $10k – $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% | |
| ≥ $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% |
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.
no clear signal: fees/hr -21%, vol share +0%, competitor vol/hr n/a over first 72h
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $9 → $8 | -10% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 5.60 → 7.84 |
| 24h | 24 | $9 → $7 | -24% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 5.60 → 7.74 |
| 72h | 72 | $9 → $7 | -21% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 5.60 → 7.99 |
| 7d | 168 | $9 → $4 | -52% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 5.60 → 7.96 |
| Router | Before | After | Δ | Swaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x29be31e7…3e9a7b | $11.0K | $5.9K | -46% | 2,581 → 4,227 |
| 0x278d858f…6ef8d2 | $2.6K | $1.2K | -52% | 571 → 857 |
| 0x0c73aead…ce6cec | $302 | $110 | -64% | 50 → 87 |
| 0x8f10b468…13f996 | $276 | $98 | -64% | 44 → 46 |
| 0x8b4f4c80…94ee39 | $721 | $632 | -12% | 123 → 317 |
| 0xb585639f…f2768f | $137 | $92 | -33% | 3 → 10 |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
only 0 post-change hour(s) so far — too early to judge
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
| 24h | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
| 72h | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
| 7d | 0 | $0 → pending | — | — → pending | — | $0 → — | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0x8b39…f5bf| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 23:50 | base 400→650 | $343.7K → $134.6K | -61% | $185 → $99 | -46% | 5.39 → 7.38 | 23d vs 11d |
| 2026-08-22 06:08 | K 7000000→9000000, base 750→400 | $0 → $343.7K | — | $0 → $185 | — | — → 5.39 | 0d vs 23d |
| 2026-07-28 03:12 | base 500→750 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-07-16 05:34 | K 3500000→7000000, base 750→500 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-06-18 23:13 | K 5000000→3500000, base 500→750 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-06-09 19:49 | cap 4000→3000, base 1000→500 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-06-09 18:49 | cap ?→4000, K ?→5000000, base ?→1000 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
Pools (12)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $488.1K | $2.18M | $7.59M | $387 | $1.5K | $4.4K | $84.9K | — | |
| topaz v3 | 30 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — | |
| pancake infinity | hook | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — | |
| pancake infinity | hook | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | — | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #1, lifetime_volume #172, liquidity #173 | |
| pancake v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| pancake v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| uniswap v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #1, liquidity #160 | |
| uniswap v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 | |
| uniswap v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.