← Opportunities · Pairs

44/WBNB

0x444446d6c6d1a4777d26b7746ea240ed0cc44444 / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x444446d6c6d1a4777d26b7746ea240ed0cc44444-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-08-08 (UTC)

Opportunity score

Score
0
Confidence
low
Topaz present
yes

Types: ignore_or_monitor

Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet

Reason codes: topaz_only_no_competitor

Scored as of 2026-08-08.

Trends (daily, 34d window)

Volume over time
Fees earned over time
Effective fee (bps) over time
Topaz volume share over time

Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)

100.0% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.

Trade sizeSwapsVolumeShare of volume
< $10017$32312.3%
$100 – $1k7$2.3K87.7%
$1k – $10k0$00.0%
$10k – $100k0$00.0%
≥ $100k0$00.0%

Fee change effectiveness (hourly)

Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.

topaz2026-07-05 20:51 UTCK 44444444→444444444inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0$0$0$0
24h24$0$6100%$0$0418.74
72h72$0$8100%$0$0411.17
7d168$0$5100%$0$0406.39
Router reaction (volume/hr before → after)
RouterBeforeAfterΔSwaps
0x9b63ca876e0cae$0$203new0111
0x09ad820a024afa$0$2new02
topaz2026-07-04 19:42 UTCK 4444444444→44444444inconclusivemedium24h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0$0$0$0
24h24$0$0$0$0
72h24$0$0$0$0
7d24$0$0$0$0
topaz2026-06-18 01:02 UTCcap ?→44444, K ?→4444444444, base ?→11111inconclusiveconfident168h elapsed

no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against

WindowAfter hrsTopaz fees/hr before→afterΔVol share before→afterΔCompetitor vol/hrΔEff bps before→after
6h6$0$0$0$0
24h24$0$0$0$0
72h72$0$0$0$0
7d168$0$0$0$0

Fee change impact

On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).

topaz v3 0x3a6c6db8
When (UTC)ChangeVol/day before→afterΔFees/day before→afterΔEff bps before→afterWindow
2026-07-05 20:51K 44444444→444444444$0$813$0$33399.980d vs 34d
2026-07-04 19:42K 4444444444→44444444$0pending$0pending0d vs
2026-06-18 01:02cap ?→44444, K ?→4444444444, base ?→11111$0pending$0pending0d vs

Pools (1)

DEXFeeTick7d vol14d vol30d vol7d fees14d fees30d feesLiquidityCandidate reasons
topaz v3dynamic200$2.2K$2.6K$8.6K$92$103$318$66.8K

Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.