ETH/WBNB
0x2170ed0880ac9a755fd29b2688956bd959f933f8 / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x2170ed0880ac9a755fd29b2688956bd959f933f8-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-10-08 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: ignore_or_monitor
Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet
Reason codes: topaz_only_no_competitor
Scored as of 2026-10-08.
Trends (daily, 34d window)
Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)
95.7% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.
| Trade size | Swaps | Volume | Share of volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < $100 | 37,300 | $1.26M | 23.8% | |
| $100 – $1k | 21,351 | $3.82M | 71.9% | |
| $1k – $10k | 40 | $74.3K | 1.4% | |
| $10k – $100k | 6 | $152.7K | 2.9% | |
| ≥ $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% |
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.
no clear signal: fees/hr +18%, vol share +0%, competitor vol/hr n/a over first 72h
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $3 → $3 | +11% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.81 → 2.75 |
| 24h | 24 | $3 → $3 | +11% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.81 → 2.87 |
| 72h | 72 | $3 → $4 | +18% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.81 → 2.83 |
| 7d | 168 | $3 → $3 | +8% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.81 → 2.87 |
| Router | Before | After | Δ | Swaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x278d858f…6ef8d2 | $11.2K | $3.0K | -73% | 1,732 → 1,241 |
| 0x0c73aead…ce6cec | $8.5K | $3.2K | -62% | 5,265 → 3,657 |
| 0x29be31e7…3e9a7b | $7.3K | $2.7K | -62% | 1,145 → 1,168 |
| 0xa0196b5e…fe77f3 | $1.9K | $803 | -57% | 170 → 223 |
| 0x21f09032…c53081 | $828 | $0 | -100% | 3 → 0 |
| 0x9b63ca87…6e0cae | $1.2K | $403 | -67% | 213 → 184 |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0x7955…be53| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 23:50 | base 50→250 | $1.80M → $342.5K | -81% | $153 → $82 | -47% | 0.85 → 2.39 | 23d vs 11d |
| 2026-07-28 03:12 | cap 1000→500, K 8000000→6000000, base 75→50 | $0 → $1.80M | — | $0 → $153 | — | — → 0.85 | 0d vs 23d |
| 2026-07-16 05:34 | cap ?→1000, K 5000000→8000000 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-07-01 00:22 | K 3500000→5000000, base ?→75 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-06-18 23:13 | K ?→3500000 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
Pools (10)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $1.90M | $6.19M | $34.15M | $559 | $1.1K | $3.5K | $125.8K | — | |
| pancake infinity | hook | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | liquidity #214 | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| pancake v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #1, lifetime_volume #8, liquidity #168 | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3, lifetime_volume #122, liquidity #127 | |
| pancake v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #11, liquidity #40 | |
| uniswap v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_14d_volume #4, recent_28d_volume #5, recent_14d_fees #7, liquidity #9, recent_28d_fees #9, lifetime_volume #12 | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2, liquidity #45, recent_14d_volume #101, recent_14d_fees #119, recent_28d_volume #139, lifetime_volume #195 | |
| uniswap v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 | |
| uniswap v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.