ETH/BTCB
0x2170ed0880ac9a755fd29b2688956bd959f933f8 / 0x7130d2a12b9bcbfae4f2634d864a1ee1ce3ead9c
pairKey 0x2170ed0880ac9a755fd29b2688956bd959f933f8-0x7130d2a12b9bcbfae4f2634d864a1ee1ce3ead9c · as of 2026-10-08 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: ignore_or_monitor
Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet
Reason codes: topaz_only_no_competitor
Scored as of 2026-10-08.
Trends (daily, 34d window)
Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)
99.7% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.
| Trade size | Swaps | Volume | Share of volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < $100 | 27,286 | $839.3K | 63.6% | |
| $100 – $1k | 3,212 | $476.7K | 36.1% | |
| $1k – $10k | 3 | $3.9K | 0.3% | |
| $10k – $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% | |
| ≥ $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% |
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.
no clear signal: fees/hr +12%, vol share +0%, competitor vol/hr n/a over first 72h
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $1 → $1 | -27% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.84 → 2.32 |
| 24h | 24 | $1 → $1 | +9% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.84 → 2.38 |
| 72h | 72 | $1 → $1 | +12% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.84 → 2.35 |
| 7d | 168 | $1 → $1 | -6% | 100% → 100% | +0% | $0 → $0 | — | 0.84 → 2.38 |
| Router | Before | After | Δ | Swaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x0c73aead…ce6cec | $3.7K | $1.2K | -67% | 2,989 → 2,540 |
| 0x29be31e7…3e9a7b | $2.5K | $1.1K | -57% | 637 → 787 |
| 0x278d858f…6ef8d2 | $1.6K | $533 | -67% | 397 → 375 |
| 0x7a7ad9aa…4997ff | $172 | $412 | +140% | 197 → 1,374 |
| 0xa0196b5e…fe77f3 | $390 | $158 | -60% | 56 → 68 |
| 0x09ad820a…024afa | $257 | $60 | -77% | 165 → 117 |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 106 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0xf0ea…6acc| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-28 23:50 | base ?→200 | $432.8K → $92.2K | -79% | $37 → $19 | -48% | 0.86 → 2.10 | 23d vs 11d |
| 2026-06-23 10:53 | K 3500000→7000000 | $0 → $432.8K | — | $0 → $37 | — | — → 0.86 | 0d vs 23d |
| 2026-06-18 23:13 | K ?→3500000 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
Pools (10)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $499.4K | $1.45M | $8.41M | $127 | $248 | $870 | $55.2K | — | |
| pancake infinity | hook | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | liquidity #210 | |
| pancake v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #1, lifetime_volume #13, liquidity #59 | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| pancake v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #19 | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3, lifetime_volume #39, liquidity #89 | |
| uniswap v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_14d_fees #18, recent_14d_volume #19, recent_28d_volume #19, liquidity #24, recent_28d_fees #24, lifetime_volume #41 | |
| uniswap v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2, lifetime_volume #136 | |
| uniswap v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.