XRP/USDT
0x1d2f0da169ceb9fc7b3144628db156f3f6c60dbe / 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955
pairKey 0x1d2f0da169ceb9fc7b3144628db156f3f6c60dbe-0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955 · as of 2026-08-08 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: ignore_or_monitor
Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet
Reason codes: active_days_ge_24, competitor_fee_ge_25bps, volume_30d_ge_1m, liquidity_ge_500k, declining_run_rate, major_asset_side
Scored as of 2026-08-08.
Trends (daily, 34d window)
Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)
96.6% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.
| Trade size | Swaps | Volume | Share of volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < $100 | 7,349 | $404.4K | 47.2% | |
| $100 – $1k | 2,741 | $424.2K | 49.5% | |
| $1k – $10k | 14 | $28.8K | 3.4% | |
| $10k – $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% | |
| ≥ $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% |
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 22 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 22 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 22 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0x5a35…98a0| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 23:13 | K 2500000→2000000, base 500→1000 | $0 → $63.2K | — | $0 → $63 | — | — → 10.00 | 0d vs 34d |
| 2026-06-10 18:28 | K 5000000→2500000, base 250→500 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-06-09 19:55 | cap ?→1000, K ?→5000000, base ?→250 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
Pools (8)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $346.9K | $858.7K | $1.80M | $347 | $859 | $1.8K | $24.1K | — | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $87.5K | $1.16M | $3.56M | $219 | $2.9K | $8.9K | $1.65M | pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_28d_fees #56, recent_14d_fees #60, liquidity #109, recent_14d_volume #137, lifetime_volume #154 | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $275.6K | $525.1K | $1.17M | $827 | $1.6K | $3.5K | $503.7K | pair_scoped_supplement #1, liquidity #23, lifetime_volume #53, recent_14d_volume #61, recent_14d_fees #79, recent_28d_volume #81 | |
| uniswap v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $12 | $30 | $77 | $0 | $0 | $1 | $489 | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $0 | $0 | $2 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $303 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| pancake v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 | |
| pancake v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| uniswap v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.