ZEC/WBNB
0x1ba42e5193dfa8b03d15dd1b86a3113bbbef8eeb / 0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c
pairKey 0x1ba42e5193dfa8b03d15dd1b86a3113bbbef8eeb-0xbb4cdb9cbd36b01bd1cbaebf2de08d9173bc095c · as of 2026-08-08 (UTC)
Opportunity score
Types: ignore_or_monitor
Recommended action: monitor only; do not incentivize yet
Reason codes: active_days_ge_24, competitor_fee_ge_25bps, liquidity_ge_100k, declining_run_rate, major_asset_side
Scored as of 2026-08-08.
Trends (daily, 34d window)
Trade-size mix (Topaz, last 14d)
97.8% of this pair's Topaz volume is sub-$1k fills. Small, aggregator-routed flow is generally less sensitive to a fee change than size shopping for execution — so a book weighted to the top of this table has more fee headroom than its volume alone suggests.
| Trade size | Swaps | Volume | Share of volume | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| < $100 | 6,358 | $334.7K | 76.7% | |
| $100 – $1k | 578 | $91.7K | 21.0% | |
| $1k – $10k | 7 | $9.7K | 2.2% | |
| $10k – $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% | |
| ≥ $100k | 0 | $0 | 0.0% |
Fee change effectiveness (hourly)
Competitor-normalized before/after at the hour level. The change hour is excluded; "before" is the 24 closed hours prior, each "after" window the first 6/24/72/168 closed hours since (bounded by the next change). Verdict weighs Topaz fees/hr and volume share and competitor flow — a fee that lifts revenue but bleeds routing share is not "working". Topaz hourly data refreshes hourly (:05), so a change shows pending only until its first 6 post-change hours close; competitor flows ride the 6-hourly collect, so the normalized side can trail by up to ~6h.
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 106 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
no pre-change Topaz volume to compare against
| Window | After hrs | Topaz fees/hr before→after | Δ | Vol share before→after | Δ | Competitor vol/hr | Δ | Eff bps before→after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6h | 6 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 24h | 24 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 72h | 72 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
| 7d | 168 | $0 → $0 | — | — → — | — | $0 → $0 | — | — → — |
Fee change impact
On-chain fee changes on this pair's Topaz pool(s), with volume & fee generation before vs after each change. Each side spans all days until the adjacent change; rates are per active day (the two sides usually differ in length). Marked on the charts above. Values are raw module units (pips, ÷100 = bps; scaling is the raw uint64 K).
0x2724…cddc| When (UTC) | Change | Vol/day before→after | Δ | Fees/day before→after | Δ | Eff bps before→after | Window |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-23 10:53 | cap 3000→10000, K 3500000→7000000, base 1500→1000 | $0 → $38.1K | — | $0 → $44 | — | — → 11.54 | 0d vs 34d |
| 2026-06-18 23:13 | K 5000000→3500000, base 1000→1500 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
| 2026-06-09 18:46 | cap ?→3000, K ?→5000000, base ?→1000 | $0 → pending | — | $0 → pending | — | — → — | 0d vs — |
Pools (7)
| DEX | Fee | Tick | 7d vol | 14d vol | 30d vol | 7d fees | 14d fees | 30d fees | Liquidity | Candidate reasons | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| topaz v3 | dynamic | 50 | $209.4K | $422.5K | $1.13M | $239 | $479 | $1.3K | $11.5K | — | |
| pancake v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $28.9K | $147.4K | $485.6K | $289 | $1.5K | $4.9K | $249.4K | pair_scoped_supplement #1, recent_28d_fees #89, recent_14d_fees #97 | |
| uniswap v3 | 100 bps | 200 | $34.4K | $63.6K | $163.6K | $344 | $636 | $1.6K | $63.0K | pair_scoped_supplement #1, liquidity #85 | |
| pancake v3 | 25 bps | 50 | $14 | $1.6K | $1.9K | $0 | $4 | $5 | $8.7K | pair_scoped_supplement #2 | |
| pancake v3 | 1 bps | 1 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #4 | |
| pancake v3 | 5 bps | 10 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #3 | |
| uniswap v3 | 30 bps | 60 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | pair_scoped_supplement #2 |
Candidate reasons explain why an external pool entered the discovery set (recent 14d/28d fees & volume, liquidity, lifetime volume). Tick spacing is a secondary review signal.